Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Buapim, Isaac vs Vargas, Edgar A., et al.
Case # 816247/2024E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 17, 2024
Complaint
Description: On November 19, 2023 Plaintiff was lawfully shopping at a store when an employee falsely accused Plaintiff of wrongdoing on the basis of Plaintiff's race. PO Edgar A. Vargas responded and wrongfully assaulted Plaintiff, repeatedly touching and showing Plaintiff in an aggressive manner for several minutes in public. PO Vargas also pepper sprayed Plaintiff without legal justification. Plaintiff was then falsely arrested and taken to a hospital. Plaintiff suffered serious and permanent physical and psychological injuries as a result of this incident.