Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Yolanda I. Rios
Badge #2143,
Hispanic Female
Service
started December 2020,
made $58,600 last year,
Tax #970808
Complaints
2
Complaints
5
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2
Complainant Unavailable
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202311322,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn |
| Complainant: | Male, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #202204110,
June 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | American Indian Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202311322, June 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Male, 60-64 | Complainant Unavailable |
| Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn | Male, 60-64 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202204110, June 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | American Indian Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | American Indian Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | American Indian Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-29557
Closed: 2/6/2024
Case Details:
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training