Ali M. Alomaisi

Ali M. Alomaisi

Ali M. Alomaisi
Badge #23797, White Male
Police Officer at 63rd Precinct since November 2025
Service started January 2017, made $188,000 last year, Tax #962918

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Discourtesy: Action
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-20900
Closed: 3/19/2024

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$22,500   Joseph, Germel vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 507121/2022
$77,000   Grant, Khamir, et Al vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 KCSC KCSC 509814/2021
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
19 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Exonerated
4 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202502094, March 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202409431, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202202325, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202103206, May 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202007271, October 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202005170, July 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 18, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201807333, September 2018
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 18, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202502094, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Female, 65-69 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Female, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 65-69 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202409431, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202202325, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202103206, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202007271, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 15-17 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202005170, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Female, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Black Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device Black Female, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 18, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201807333, September 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Hispanic Female, 22 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 22 Exonerated
Force: Restricted Breathing Hispanic Female, 22 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 18, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-20900
Closed: 3/19/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully used a chokehold.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $99,500 total settlements.

Joseph, Germel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 507121/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, April 12, 2022, ended May 6, 2025
$22,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On January 5, 2021, Plaintiff was driving his vehicle when he heard sirens and pulled to the side of the road. Officers Ali Alomaisi and POs John and Jane Does 1-12 asked for his license and registration. Both were valid and unexpired. Officers then informed Plaintiff his license plate was fraudulent, without checking their computer to validate his license or registration. Plaintiff explained that his license plate was a valid, temporary plate. The Vehicle Identification Number on the plate matched that on Plaintiff's car insurance, but the officers never attempted to validate the VIN. Plaintiff was arrested and charged with improper tints on his vehicle, though the officers never mentioned the tints at the tim...

Grant, Khamir, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 509814/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, April 8, 2021, ended March 7, 2023
$77,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 31, 2021, while the plaintiff was lawfully driving a rental car with the proper paperwork to prove it, he was suddenly stopped by NYPD officers. The defendant officers broke the passenger side window where the plaintiff was seated, attempted to pull his arm through the broken glass, discharged a taser into him, pulled him out of the car, handcuffed him, and searched his person. The taser prongs penetrated the plaintiff's jacket and shirt, lodged into his skin, and required the use of a scalpel for removal. Although the plaintiff was arrested for driving a stolen car, this allegation was not true.

Turner, Tristan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503203/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, February 11, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about January 29, 2019, plaintiff was lawfully present in the vicinity of East 55th Street, between Avenue H and Avenue I, Brooklyn, when defendant police officers George Antzoulis, Ali Alomaisi, Zalenski Sargent Peter N. Behan, and police officers John Does 1 - 10, unlawfully stopped, questioned, frisked, searched, illegally seized, falsely imprisoned, and falsely arrested plaintiff. Defendants unlawfully handcuffed plaintiff and transported him to the 63rd Precinct whereat plaintiff was unlawfully searched, fingerprinted, photographed, and detained in a holding cell for many hours. Thereafter, plaintiff was transported to Kings County Central Booking whereat the unlawful detention continued. Defendants ...

Raghunanan, Harold vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 501316/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, January 26, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about January 29, 2019, at approximately 9:00p.m, at which time plaintiff was lawfully present in the vicinity of East 55th Street, between Avenue H and Avenue I, Brooklyn, New York, the defendant officers George Antzoulis, Ali Alomaisi, Peter N. Behan and others (together the "defendants") unlawfully stopped, questioned, frisked, searched, illegally seized, falsely imprisoned, and falsely arrested plaintiff without reasonable suspicion, probable cause or any legal justification. Those officers that did not touch plaintiff failed to intervene. Plaintiff had been conversing about a vehicle with his family friend at the time (who owned the vehicle in question) when the defendants approached them. Plaintiff ...

Other Documents