Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word
Discourtesy: Word
Edward J. Guzik
Badge #20027,
White Male, 41
Police Officer at 17th Precinct since September 2008
Service
started July 2007,
made $167,000 last year,
Tax #944628
Complaints
4
Complaints
10
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Instructions)
4
Complainant Unavailable
2
Exonerated
1
Unfounded
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #201610306,
December 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 67 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 67 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201303468,
April 2013
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 62 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #201111674,
September 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Female, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Instructions) |
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
| Complainant: | White Male, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | White Male, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Penalty: | Instructions |
Complaint #200915116,
September 2009
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #201610306, December 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Female, 67 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | Hispanic Female, 67 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201303468, April 2013 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 62 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201111674, September 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | White Male, 49 | Exonerated |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Female, 49 | Substantiated (Instructions) |
| Force: Chokehold | White Male, 49 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 49 | Unsubstantiated |
| Penalty: Instructions | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200915116, September 2009 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Complainant Unavailable | |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number | Complainant Unavailable | |
| Discourtesy: Word | Complainant Unavailable | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Deluca, Sam, et Al vs City of New York, et al.Case # 12CV08896, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 11, 2012, ended March 5, 2014
Zero Disposition