Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $8,060 total settlements.
Bernazard, Jose vs Police Officer Koch, Joseph, et al.
Case # 15CV00642,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 26, 2015, ended September 25, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about June 16, 2013, plaintiff Jose Bernazard returned home to the apartment that he shared with Ms. Rodriquez. Upon arrival, he discovered Ms. Rodriquez attempting to hide Defendant Officer Koch in the apartment. An argument broke out, and Ms. Rodriquez admitted to an ongoing sexual relationship with Defendant Officer Koch.
At this point, Defendant Officer Koch appeared and pointed his gun at plaintiff Bernazard's face. Plaintiff Bernazard attempted to push the gun away, and Defendant Officer Koch shot him in his left hand and left hip. Plaintiff Bernazard then pushed Defendant Officer Koch toward the wall. Koch's gun hit the floor, where it discharged and shot Defendant Officer Koch in the hand. Defend...
Marrero, Alfredo vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV05562,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 25, 2014, ended February 3, 2015
$8,060 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 1, 2011, Plaintiff was buzzed by his grandmother into her apartment building so that he could provide care. Plaintiff lived in a different building in the complex. Plaintiff was stopped without probable cause by Defendant NYPD Officers Gregory Lomangino, Joseph Koch and Sergeant James Geissler, which officers had previously repeatedly stopped and harassed him in an effort to make Plaintiff move from the complex. Those officers had even visited Plaintiff’s apartment to force him to move out in part because Plaintiff relied on Section 8 vouchers.
Although the Officers knew Plaintiff lived in another building in the complex they asked Plaintiff if he was a resident. Plaintiff stated he had a leg...
Pierre v. The City of New York et al
Case # 14CV07391,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Amended Complaint,
Broken Link
Description: Plaintiff was arrested on " criminal contempt' after being interrogated at his residence over a cross- complaint he had with his girlfriend. Was taken to two different precinct and then to central bookings. Da did not prosecute.
Ligon v. City of New York
Case # 12CV02274,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Broken Link,
ligon.PDF
Description: Large litigation against Operation Clean Halls. Miguel Santiago (43rd precinct) is found incredible and the judge concludes that he did not truthfully fill out paperwork after one plaintiff's arrest and credits plaintiff's testimony that he was strip searched by Santiago, which Santiago denied on the stand. Santiago's partner was Landro Perez.Kieron Ramdeen, 46th Precinct. The judge finds he testified inaccurately regarding which officers he was working with on the night of the challenged arrest. He said he was not working with a ìHispanic officerî that night, after the plaintiff described one of the three officers who arrested him as Hispanic. Ramdeen's partner, PO Michael Pomerantz's memo book indicates that ...