Complaint #201102161, February 2011

Incident: February 17, 2011
Received: February 18, 2011
Closed: June 13, 2012


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 101st Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Lomangino, Gregory
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lomangino, Gregory
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Koch, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Lomangino, Gregory
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lomangino, Gregory
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lomangino, Gregory Hispanic Male, 16 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Lomangino, Gregory Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Koch, Joseph Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Lomangino, Gregory Hispanic Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Unsubstantiated
Lomangino, Gregory Hispanic Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Other Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Lomangino, Gregory
Instructions

Koch, Joseph
Negttn-Nolo contendre
Vacation: 3 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.