Edward A. Weisenburger

Edward A. Weisenburger

Edward A. Weisenburger
Badge #18143, White Male
Police Officer at Strategic Response Group 1 Manhattan since December 2017
Service started January 2012, made $186,000 last year, Tax #952338

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202601887, February 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202308620, September 2023
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202303955, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202007667, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202601887, February 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202308620, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202303955, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202007667, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case Details:
  1. Failed to make proper notifications.
Recommendation: Other

Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Lasalle, Jose vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 157026/2024, Supreme Court - New York, August 6, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about May 6, 2023 Plaintiff was documenting a civil march when PO Sandy Vargas informed him where to stand. Plaintiff complied but despite his compliance PO Brian McGinn began falsely arresting Plaintiff, and was assisted by PO Vargas and other officers. Specifically, POs grabbed him, tripped him, forced him to the ground, struck him, and placed excessively tight handcuffs on Plaintiff. Plaintiff was not told what he was being arrested for but complied with all orders. Plaintiff was taken to the 7th Precinct where he was searched in intimate areas, causing embarrassment and humiliation. Plaintiff repeatedly fainted while in custody but was denied his requests for medical attention while he was in transpor...

Bolton, Shady vs City of Ny
Case # 153302/2022, Supreme Court - New York, April 20, 2022
Complaint
Description: On January 16, 2021, while lawfully driving near 121st Street and Park Avenue in Manhattan in his newly-purchased 2004 Nissan, the plaintiff was illegally stopped, searched, battered, assaulted, and arrested by defendant officers Onabanjo and Weisenburger without legal justification. The officers falsely claimed there was no license plate on the back of the car, despite the plaintiff having affixed a temporary plate to the back window. The plaintiff offered to call the seller to address the officers' concerns, but they refused and demanded he step out of the car before immediately arresting him. The plaintiff was not informed of the basis for his arrest until much later, when the officers stated they believed t...

Other Documents