Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons
James C. Mariconi
Badge #13121,
White Male
Police Officer at Midtown South Precinct since November 2013
Also served at
Patrol Borough Manhattan North
Service
started July 2012,
made $210,000 last year,
Tax #953048
Lawsuit Settlements:
$12,000 Corniel, Noreddy vs City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV03584
View Details
$12,000 Corniel, Noreddy vs City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV03584
View Details
Complaints
5
Complaints
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2
SRAD Closure
2
Unsubstantiated
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202501154,
January 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202308084,
August 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Chinese Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Chinese Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons |
| Complainant: | Chinese Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202303800,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201403096,
March 2014
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 31 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201301443,
February 2013
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #202501154, January 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202308084, August 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Chinese Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Chinese Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Summons | Chinese Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303800, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201403096, March 2014 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 31 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201301443, February 2013 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male, 21 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Corniel, Noreddy vs City of New York, et al.Case # 16CV03584, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 14, 2016, ended September 25, 2017
$12,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: 1st Incident: Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant Officer McBrearty and charged with 221.40; 221.10; and 221.05; which were later dismissed. 2nd Incident: Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant Officer Wally and charged with 221.40; which was later dismissed. 3rd Incident: Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant Officer McNulty and charged with 221.40;221.10; and 221.05, which were later dismissed. 4th Incident: Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant Officer Mariconi and charged with 140.10(a); which was later dismissed.