Christopher S. Singh

Christopher S. Singh

Christopher S. Singh
Badge #1593, Asian Male
Police Officer at Criminal Intelligence Section since March 2023
Also served at Police Service Area 9
Service started January 2016, made $142,000 last year, Tax #961288

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30361
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case: 2022-26065
Closed: 1/27/2023

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
9 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202208393, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202103045, June 2020
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201809823, October 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202208393, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202103045, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Female, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 25-29 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201809823, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 26 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30361
Closed: 5/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
  4. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-26065
Closed: 1/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Pulley, Brenden vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 709512/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, May 11, 2023

Haynes, Malique vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 700021/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, January 11, 2022
Complaint
Description: On October 3, 2020, P.O. falsely imprisoned and illegally searched Plaintiff in the vicinity of 41-14 Vernon Boulevard, Queens. P.O. forcefully handcuffed and seized Plaintiff in an excessive manner about his person, causing him physical pain and mental suffering. At no time did Plaintiff consent to the unlawful actions of Defendant. The Plaintiff was held in custody for 4 days before he was released without being charged by Queens District Attorney or arraigned on charges in Criminal Court.

Wilson, Shaquille vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 700012/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, January 11, 2022
Complaint
Description: On October 3, 2020. P.O. wrongfully and unlawfully arrested Plaintiff in the vicinity of 41-14 Vernon Boulevard, Queens. P.O. forcefully handcuffed and seized Plaintiff in an excessive manner about his person, causing him physical pain and mental suffering. P.O.s restrained the Plaintiff and his liberty and then took him into custody, causing him to be incarcerated as a detainee in the City of NY Jail, to stay in a local police precinct holding cell, and to Central Booking. The Plaintiff was thereafter held in custody for 24 hours before he was released. P.O. intentionally confined the Plaintiff without his consent.

Wilson, Susie vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 700009/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, January 11, 2022
Complaint
Description: On October 3, 3021, Michael Alpers of Housing PSA and other NYPD officers illegally searched, falsely imprisoned, assaulted, battered, forcefully handcuffed, and arrested Plaintiff. Plaintiff was taken to a local precinct and remained in police custody for four hours but was never charged with a crime.