Marcelo A. Espinoza

Marcelo A. Espinoza

Marcelo A. Espinoza
Badge #20073, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since December 2017
Service started October 2016, made $164,000 last year, Tax #962388

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202409916, September 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202100898, February 2021
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 29, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202004000, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: American Indian, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: American Indian, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: American Indian, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: American Indian, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202409916, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202100898, February 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, December 29, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202004000, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital American Indian, 50-54 Exonerated
Force: Physical force American Indian, 50-54 Unsubstantiated
Force: Restricted Breathing American Indian, 50-54 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) American Indian, 50-54 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Douglas, Jennifer vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 159321/2023, Supreme Court - New York, October 17, 2023
Complaint
Description: On October 1 2022, the Plaintiff was lawfully insider her residence when approached by NYPD Officer Ehsan Rahman, Marcelo Espinoza, Drew Vinci, Officer Millewu, Anthony Flores, and John and Jane Does. They proceeded to assault and batter her before grabbing her arms and violently applying excessively tight hand cuffs. She was transported to the 28th Precinct and placed in a holding cell until her release that evening.