Complaint #202004000, May 2020

Incident: May 18, 2020
Received: June 8, 2020
Closed: February 28, 2022

Reason for contact: EDP aided case
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Joshua Faranda, Eddie Pena, Damian Weber

Officer:	Dan, Stefan
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Dan, Stefan
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dan, Stefan
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Espinoza, Marcelo
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Espinoza, Marcelo
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Espinoza, Marcelo
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Force: Restricted Breathing
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Espinoza, Marcelo
Complainant:	American Indian, 50-54
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Dan, Stefan	American Indian, 50-54	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated
Dan, Stefan	American Indian, 50-54	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Dan, Stefan	American Indian, 50-54	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital	Exonerated
Espinoza, Marcelo	American Indian, 50-54	Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital	Exonerated
Espinoza, Marcelo	American Indian, 50-54	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Espinoza, Marcelo	American Indian, 50-54	Force: Restricted Breathing	Unsubstantiated
Espinoza, Marcelo	American Indian, 50-54	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.