Wilmar Jeangilles

Badge #5299, Black Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since March 2024
Also served at 103rd Precinct
Service started July 2018, made $191,000 last year, Tax #966119

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30558
Closed: 5/14/2024

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300256, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202208739, December 2022
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202203562, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Forcible Touching)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202202367, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202005913, June 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202002011, January 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202300256, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202208739, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Question Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202203562, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sexual Miscon (Forcible Touching) Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202202367, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202005913, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202002011, January 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 40-44 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30558
Closed: 5/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A