Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Marcarthur Jean
Badge #30935,
Black Male
Police Officer at Police Service Area 1 since August 2023
Service
started January 2018,
made $181,000 last year,
Tax #965219
Complaints
5
Complaints
18
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Complainant Uncooperative
3
Complaint Withdrawn
8
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
1
Victim Unidentified
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202601800,
February 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202407332,
July 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Victim Unidentified |
Complaint #202311452,
November 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202200476,
January 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Not guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, February 24, 2025 |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Trial Decision |
Complaint #202001374,
February 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Complaint #202601800, February 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 45-49 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202407332, July 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 15-17 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Victim Unidentified | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202311452, November 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Black Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202200476, January 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Action | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, February 24, 2025 | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Trial Decision | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202001374, February 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Black Female, 45-49 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Black Female, 45-49 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Female, 45-49 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-29675
Closed: 3/19/2024
Case Details:
- Off-duty employment without permission.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B