Peterson Fresnel

Badge #1336, Black Male
Detective Grade 3 at 101st Precinct Detective Squad since April 2013, active
Also served at 105th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $149,000 last year, Tax #936619

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Complaints

6 Complaints
18 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
8 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202001716, March 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201102980, March 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201006259, May 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200904323, March 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200900443, January 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200801825, January 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202001716, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201102980, March 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 14 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201006259, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200904323, March 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200900443, January 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200801825, January 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 22 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 36 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 36 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 22 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits.

Spann-Armour, Lavarr vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 709376/2020, Supreme Court - Queens, September 15, 2020

Redd, Derrick vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV02917, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 31, 2019, ended December 30, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On October 25, 2008, the body of 9-month pregnant Niasha Delain was found Derrick Redd and Delain’s mother, Towanda Wimms. Redd was the father of the child Delain was carrying. NYPD arrived and interviewed Redd and Wimms, as well as the resident in the apartment above Delain, who said she had not heard anything and didn’t know the apartment was even occupied. Redd accompanied the detectives to the precinct and cooperated fully without invoking his right to counsel While at the station, Edward Balfe, Ronald Waldron, and Billy Milan interrogated Redd unlawfully and falsely claimed Redd made certain statements to him. During this, P.O. Fresnel was in the interview room with Redd, she offered false statements in ...

Reid, Kevin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 708546/2019, Supreme Court - Queens, May 22, 2019

Reid, Kevin vs City of New York et al.
Case # 718487/2018, Supreme Court - Queens, December 28, 2018, ended March 15, 2019
Zero Disposition

Other Documents

Employment History Summary
DA Disclosure Letter