Complaint #202001716, March 2020

Incident: March 1, 2020
Closed: February 28, 2022

Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Parking violation
Location: Police building
In NYPD 101st Precinct Queens
Outcome: Parking summons issued

Witness Officers: Michael Lynch, Mohammad Rahman
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Reddington, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Singh, Pargat
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Singh, Pargat
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Singh, Pargat
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fuller, Marcus
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fuller, Marcus
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fresnel, Peterson
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Reddington, Michael Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Singh, Pargat Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Singh, Pargat Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Singh, Pargat Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Fuller, Marcus Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Fuller, Marcus Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Fresnel, Peterson Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Fresnel, Peterson Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Substantiated (Command Discipline B)

Penalties

Reddington, Michael
Pending
APU - Decision Pending

Fresnel, Peterson
Pending
APU - Decision Pending

Singh, Pargat
Command Discipline - A
Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 3 days)


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.