Juan Marte

Juan Marte

Juan Marte
Badge #15986, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 49th Precinct since October 2017
Service started July 2016, made $145,000 last year, Tax #961919

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Discourtesy: Word (3)
Offensive Language: Disability

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29558
Closed: 2/6/2024

View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
22 Allegations
12 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
6 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500869, January 2025
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202402747, February 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202400601, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 31, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
additional details

Complaint #202204110, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: American Indian Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202203679, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202107719, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 31, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
additional details

Complaint #201804535, May 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 57
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 57
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201706365, July 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202500869, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Puerto Rican Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Puerto Rican Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202402747, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202400601, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Offensive Language: Disability Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability) Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 31, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
additional details
Complaint #202204110, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises American Indian Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card American Indian Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number American Indian Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises American Indian Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202203679, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107719, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Female, 80-99 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 31, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B
additional details
Complaint #201804535, May 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Female, 57 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female, 57 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201706365, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Male, 45 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29558
Closed: 2/6/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Santana, Mildred vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 809922/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 28, 2023
Complaint
Description: On July 1, 2022, plaintiff Mildred Santana observed Miguel Cruz removing a boot from her car and approached him to tell him not to. Defendants police officers Juan Marte and John Doe stopped, handcuffed and arrested Miguel Cruz and Plaintiff. Plaintiff was not engaged in any unlawful or illegal activity. Plaintiff was not assisting Miguel Cruz in any way in the removal or attempted removal of the boot from her car. Subsequently, Plaintiff was arrested and transported to the 49th precinct. After spending several hours at the 49th precinct, Plaintiff was removed to Bronx County Central Booking. On July 2, 2022, Plaintiff was arraigned in Bronx County Criminal Court charging her with Criminal Mischief and Obstr...

Santana, Mildred vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 807435/2023, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 19, 2023