Loreal V. Lurch

Loreal V. Lurch

Loreal V. Lurch
Badge #7385, Black Female
Police Officer at 109th Precinct since August 2017, active
Service started April 2016, made $121,000 last year, Tax #961539

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28206
Closed: 4/26/2023

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202202563, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201908613, September 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201906907, July 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201901601, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Asian Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Asian Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201800430, December 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202202563, December 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201908613, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 60-64 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 60-64 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201906907, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 45 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 45 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 45 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201901601, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Asian Female, 35 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Asian Female, 35 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201800430, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 54 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28206
Closed: 4/26/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
  2. Wrongful search of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A