Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Joseph R. Pepperman
Badge #9149,
White Male
Police Officer at 17th Precinct since December 2025
Also served at
Field Training Unit,
Patrol Borough Manhattan South
Service
started December 2021,
made $92,600 last year,
Tax #973659
Complaints
1
Complaint
5
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3
Unable to Determine
1
Unfounded
Complaint #202401809,
January 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: | Formalized Training |
| Complaint #202401809, January 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 18-20 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Penalty: Formalized Training | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.