Thierry A. Pochat

Badge #1053, White Male
Police Officer at 107th Precinct since September 2023, active
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, 20th Precinct
Service started February 1994, made $138,000 last year, Tax #907079


Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200603498, March 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200408024, August 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200302767, April 2003
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: White Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200603498, March 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Hispanic Male, 55 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200408024, August 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200302767, April 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone White Female, 44 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 308/09
Opened: 5/4/2009
Closed: 10/4/2011
Case Details:
  1. Not Guilty: Violated an order of protection by making a phone call to an individual known to the Department
Penalty: See case# 85043/09 for penalty

Case: 85043/09
Opened: 1/27/2009
Closed: 10/4/2011
Case Details:
  1. Dismissed: Failed to report an off-duty incident to the Department
  2. Not Guilty: Violated an order of protection
  3. Guilty: Engaged in a physical altercation with an individual known to the Department
  4. Guilty: Failed to report an off-duty incident to the Department
Penalty: Forfeiture of forty-four (44) days already served on suspension, plus one (1) additional vacation day for a total of forty-five (45) days. Respondent shall be credited with the remaining thirty-two (32) days previously served on suspension.

Case: 85344/09
Opened: 5/18/2011
Closed: 10/4/2011
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Violated an order of protection by transmitting text messages to an individual known to the Department
Penalty: See case# 85043/09 for penalty


Other Documents