Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $82,500 total settlements.
Jimenez, Roselina, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023989/2018E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 25, 2018
Perez, Melvin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV00045,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 14, 2015, ended August 21, 2015
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Rojas, Geraldine vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 304070/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 25, 2014, ended March 13, 2018
$22,500 Settlement
Jiminez et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 23989/2018,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Summons/Complaint