Jose L. Rivera

Badge #24650, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Criminal Intelligence Section since July 2026
Also served at Quality Assurance, 44th Precinct
Service started January 2019, made $161,000 last year, Tax #967299

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000   Hamilton, Eugene vs City of Ny, et al., 2024 BCSC BCSC 812619/2024E
$80,000   Matthews, Tylia et Al vs City of Ny, et al., 2024 BCSC BCSC 802038/2024E
$95,000   Delarosa, Angel et Al vs City of Ny, et Al ., 2023 BCSC BCSC 817138/2023E
View Details

Complaints

9 Complaints
28 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
5 Unfounded
13 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202409806, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202403590, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202311209, November 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Dominican Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Dominican Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Dominican Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Dominican Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Dominican Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202310574, November 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202303547, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202206877, October 2022
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202102981, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202102126, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202100623, January 2021
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202409806, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202403590, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202311209, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Dominican Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Dominican Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Dominican Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Dominican Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Dominican Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202310574, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202303547, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202206877, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202102981, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 21-24 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202102126, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202100623, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 7 known lawsuits, $220,000 total settlements.

Vargas, Arnardo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 819947/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 9, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about July 28, 2024, Plaintiff was a pedestrian on the street leaving the Dominican Day Parade. Plaintiff was following the instructions of police officers directing the flow of pedestrian traffic. Plaintiff and Defendant NYPD officers Nevling got in a verbal dispute and when the Defendant repeatedly shoved Plaintiff backwards. Defendant Nevling and another Defendant NYPD officer Lopez brutally punched and struck Plaintiff about the head or body. Several other unknown Defendant NYPD officers joined in the assault of Plaintiff. Plaintiff was then confined and arrested without any legal cause or justification.

Touray, Sekou vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814540/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 26, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about December 30, 2022 minor Plaintiff was seated in the rear of a vehicle when PO Hannah Cottignies, PO Angel Henriquez, PO Ramon Mejia, PO Miguel Sanchez, PO Melissa Negron, and POs John and Jane Doe 1-15 surrounded the vehicle and ordered the occupants to exit. Some of the POs had a history of misconduct prior to this incident. The occupants, including Plaintiff, exited the vehicle as ordered. Plaintiff had been recording since the initial stop and continued recording after exiting the vehicle. POs asked Plaintiff for identification and when Plaintiff asked why POs falsely arrested Plaintiff. Specifically, POs grabbed Plaintiff, slammed him against a vehicle, and placed excessively-tight handcuffs on ...

Hamilton, Eugene vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 812619/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 9, 2024, ended February 5, 2026
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 6, 2023 Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of an intersection when PO Jose Rivera, PO Omar Aguilar Martinez, PO John Doe, and PO John Roe stopped him based in part due to racial prejudice and summarily grabbed, searched, assaulted, battered, and falsely arrested him without legal justification. Plaintiff was taken into custody and wrongfully held for over 24 hours. Plaintiff was also maliciously prosecuted, requiring him to return to court multiple times over an extended period until all charges were ultimately terminated. Plaintiff sustained physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result of this incident.

Geebro, Nathaniel W. vs City of Ny
Case # 812230/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 16, 2024

Matthews, Tylia et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 802038/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 5, 2024, ended June 11, 2025
$80,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about November 19, 2023, the plaintiff, while lawfully present, was maliciously, intentionally, and falsely accused by NYPD officers, including Jose Rivera, Michael Meneses, Joh Doe, and John Roe, of having committed a crime without just cause or probable cause. The defendants caused apprehension of hostile and offensive contact in the plaintiff, touching and beating her in a hostile and offensive manner, resulting in battery to her head, neck, back, body, and limbs. After the plaintiff was arrested, the plaintiff was maliciously prosecuted.

Delarosa, Angel et Al vs City of Ny, et Al .
Case # 817138/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 30, 2023, ended May 14, 2025
$95,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 18, 2023, police officers Jennifer Rivera (Sheild No. 5287), Jack Lopez (Tax No. 967170), Jonathan Cancel (Tax No. 966491), Jose Rivera (Tax No. 967299), Christian Cayenne (Tax No. 954620) and other police officers, without a warrant, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner.

Maya, Destiny, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 800012/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 3, 2023
Complaint
Description: On May 15, 2021, Plaintiffs were approached by NYPD Officers Jose Rivera and Marcos Monegro-Santos. Officers Rivera and Monegro-Santos demanded that Plaintiff Maya speak with Emergency Medical Services that were present on the scene. Plaintiff Maya informed them she did not need medical attention, and was walking towards her mother when the Officers grabbed her by the neck, choked her, slammed her to the ground, and struck her. The same Officers also tackled Plaintiff Frazier to the ground and hit her. Both Plaintiffs were then handcuffed and taken to a local hospital for medical treatment before being taken to the precinct. Both Plaintiffs were falsely accused of having committed 2nd degree assault and both ha...