Complaint #200810146, June 2008

Incident: June 14, 2008
Received: July 16, 2008
Closed: October 1, 2009


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 49th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Jose Caban, Charlie Kim, James Nonnon, Migdalia Ramos, David Revans, Eric Rivera
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mcgoldrick, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mcgoldrick, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Alfaro, Reynaldo
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 18-20 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Exonerated
Mcgoldrick, Christopher Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Mcgoldrick, Christopher Black Male, 18 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Male Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Unknown Officer Male Force: Physical force Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Alfaro, Reynaldo Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 18-20 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.