Complaint #200903617, March 2009

Incident: March 8, 2009
Closed: July 22, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 30th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Michael Bia, Daulyn Devers, Matthew Milligan, Waddy Santiago, Eric Soto
Officer: Ruotolo, Peter
Complainant: Black, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Castillo, Pedro
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Castillo, Pedro
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ali, Andrew
Complainant: Black, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Checa, Michael
Complainant: Black, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Urbanek, Michael
Complainant: Black, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Greco, Brian
Complainant: Black, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Romero, Carlos
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Ruotolo, Peter Black, 24 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Castillo, Pedro Black Male, 27 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Castillo, Pedro Black Male, 27 Discourtesy: Action Unsubstantiated
Ali, Andrew Black, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Checa, Michael Black, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Urbanek, Michael Black, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Greco, Brian Black, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Romero, Carlos Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Discourtesy: Word Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.