Complaint #201017207, December 2010

Incident: December 14, 2010
Received: December 20, 2010
Closed: July 14, 2011


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Guglielmo, Louis
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Guglielmo, Louis
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Guglielmo, Louis
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Smith, Shamus
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Smith, Shamus
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Smith, Shamus
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Morales, Mario
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Morales, Mario
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Guglielmo, Louis Black Male, 34 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Guglielmo, Louis Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Guglielmo, Louis Black Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Smith, Shamus Black Male, 34 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Smith, Shamus Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Smith, Shamus Black Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Morales, Mario Black Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Morales, Mario Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.