Complaint #201201686, February 2012

Incident: February 1, 2012
Received: February 7, 2012
Closed: June 6, 2013


Reason for contact: EDP aided case
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 46th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Robert Edsall, John Flanagan
Officer: Dekoker, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Roe, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Roe, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 55-59
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Roe, Andrew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Dekoker, Thomas Hispanic Male, 38 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Roe, Andrew Hispanic Male, 38 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Roe, Andrew Hispanic Male, 38 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unfounded
Unknown Officer Hispanic Female, 55-59 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Roe, Andrew Hispanic Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Roe, Andrew
Forfeit vacation 7 days
Closed: Not guilty after trial, January 2015
APU Not guilty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.