Complaint #201206460, May 2012

Incident: May 16, 2012
Received: May 18, 2012
Closed: September 4, 2013

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 25th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Khalid Bakkal, Manuel Checo, Steven Irizarry, Francisco Pena, Agustine Rodriguez

Officer:	Soler, Frankie
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Soler, Frankie
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Regent, Robert
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Regent, Robert
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Soler, Frankie
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Soler, Frankie
Complainant:	Black Male, 46
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Regent, Robert
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Soler, Frankie	Black Male, 41	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Soler, Frankie	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Unsubstantiated
Regent, Robert	Black Male, 41	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Unsubstantiated
Regent, Robert	Black Male, 41	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Soler, Frankie	Black Male, 41	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Soler, Frankie	Black Male, 46	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Regent, Robert	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.