Complaint #201300854, December 2012

Incident: December 31, 2012
Received: February 11, 2013
Closed: March 12, 2014


Document: APU Quarterly Report summary (Wilfredo Ramos)

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Danica Logan
Officer: Ramos, Wilfredo
Complainant: White Female, 29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ramos, Wilfredo
Complainant: White Female, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Garcia, Kelvin
Complainant: White Female, 18
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramos, Wilfredo
Complainant: White Female, 18
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Ramos, Wilfredo White Female, 29 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Ramos, Wilfredo White Female, 21 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Garcia, Kelvin White Female, 18 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Ramos, Wilfredo White Female, 18 Discourtesy: Action Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Ramos, Wilfredo
Instructions
Closed: Plea set aside, Comm. Disc. A, April 2016
APU Dismissed
Command Discipline A


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.