Complaint #201308963, September 2013

Incident: September 19, 2013
Received: September 25, 2013
Closed: August 14, 2014

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Keith Ames, Simon Laine, Arthur Smith

Officer:	Lieneck, Scott
Complainant:	Black Male, 46
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Amendola, Steven
Complainant:	Black Male, 46
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Baca, Daniel
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lieneck, Scott
Complainant:	Black Male, 46
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Baca, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 46
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lieneck, Scott	Black Male, 46	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unsubstantiated
Amendola, Steven	Black Male, 46	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unsubstantiated
Baca, Daniel		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Lieneck, Scott	Black Male, 46	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Baca, Daniel	Black Male, 46	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.