Complaint #201401786, February 2014

Incident: February 8, 2014
Received: February 24, 2014
Closed: May 11, 2015

Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Regulatory inspection
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Thaher Ahmed, Daniel Meade, Gene Ruda

Officer:	Volkan, John
Complainant:	Female, 70
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Volkan, John
Complainant:	Female, 70
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pimentel, Angel
Complainant:	Female, 70
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Villacis, Christian
Complainant:	Female, 70
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pimentel, Angel
Complainant:	Black Male, 70
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Female, 70-74
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Unavailable

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Volkan, John	Female, 70	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Volkan, John	Female, 70	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Pimentel, Angel	Female, 70	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Villacis, Christian	Female, 70	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Pimentel, Angel	Black Male, 70	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Female, 70-74	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Male	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Alleged Victim Unavailable

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.