Complaint from May 30, 2014

Case number 201405321
Incident: May 30, 2014
Received: June 2, 2014
Closed: October 31, 2014

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 47th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Pulgarin, Joe Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pulgarin, Joe Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Unfounded
Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Discourtesy: Action	Unfounded
Ravelo, Brandon Hispanic Male	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.