Complaint #201405990, June 2014

Incident: June 11, 2014
Received: June 17, 2014
Closed: May 15, 2015

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 34th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: William Beattie, Edwin Florez, Joseph Ierna

Officer:	Burckhard, Joseph
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dima, Vincent
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dima, Vincent
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Thomas, Lawrence
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 50-54
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Burckhard, Joseph
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Dima, Vincent
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 52
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Burckhard, Joseph	Hispanic Male, 52	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Dima, Vincent	Hispanic Male, 52	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Dima, Vincent	Hispanic Male, 52	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Thomas, Lawrence	Hispanic Male, 52	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 50-54	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Burckhard, Joseph	Hispanic Male, 52	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Dima, Vincent	Hispanic Male, 52	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.