Complaint #201509713, November 2015

Incident: November 6, 2015
Received: November 16, 2015
Closed: February 23, 2016


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Other
In NYPD 19th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Angel Perez, Dennis Walsh
Officer: Buckley, Kirth
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Rodriguez, Jose
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Buckley, Kirth
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Buckley, Kirth
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Rodriguez, Jose
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Rodriguez, Jose
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Buckley, Kirth
Complainant: Black Female, 75
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Buckley, Kirth Black Female, 75 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Rodriguez, Jose Black Female, 75 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Buckley, Kirth Black Female, 75 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Buckley, Kirth Black Female, 75 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Rodriguez, Jose Black Female, 75 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Rodriguez, Jose Black Female, 75 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Buckley, Kirth Black Female, 75 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.