Complaint #201603367, February 2016

Incident: February 29, 2016
Received: April 19, 2016
Closed: August 29, 2016


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Robert Favara, Waverly Fredericks, Eric Healy, Vanessa Kight, Simon Laine, Kenson Phillips, Michael Scire, Isaac Souchak
Officer: Galasso, Anthony
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mansharamani, Harish
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Nieh, Ching
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Noce, Sean
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Vargas, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Nieh, Ching
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mansharamani, Harish
Complainant: Black Female, 55
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Galasso, Anthony Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Mansharamani, Harish Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Nieh, Ching Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Noce, Sean Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Vargas, Daniel Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Nieh, Ching Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Mansharamani, Harish Black Female, 55 Abuse of Authority: Other Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.