Complaint #201604348, May 2016

Incident: May 13, 2016
Received: May 18, 2016
Closed: September 20, 2016


Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 62nd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Charles Gantt, James Mcdermott, William Oconnor, Michael Ohalloran, Derrick Tatum, James Williams
Officer: Bettex, Lawrence
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Kyrkos, Ioannis
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kyrkos, Ioannis
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Bettex, Lawrence
Complainant: White Female, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bettex, Lawrence
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Bettex, Lawrence White Male, 46 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Exonerated
Unknown Officer White Female, 35-39 Offensive Language: Gender Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Kyrkos, Ioannis White Male, 46 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Kyrkos, Ioannis White Male, 46 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer White Female, 35-39 Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Bettex, Lawrence White Female, 38 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Bettex, Lawrence White Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.