Complaint #201604855, May 2016

Incident: May 15, 2016
Received: June 6, 2016
Closed: November 16, 2016

Reason for contact: C/V at PCT to obtain information
Location: Police building
In NYPD 34th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Kenneth Armstrong, Catherine Coyle

Officer:	Santiago, Carlos
Complainant:	Asian Male, 69
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valentin, Pablo
Complainant:	Asian Male, 69
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Floresgreen, Tiffany
Complainant:	Asian Male, 69
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ortiz, Sicelin
Complainant:	Asian Male, 69
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Katz, Richard
Complainant:	Asian Male, 69
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Male, 65-69
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Male, 65-69
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Santiago, Carlos	Asian Male, 69	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Valentin, Pablo	Asian Male, 69	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Floresgreen, Tiffany	Asian Male, 69	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Ortiz, Sicelin	Asian Male, 69	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Katz, Richard	Asian Male, 69	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Asian Male, 65-69	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Asian Male, 65-69	Offensive Language: Race	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.