Complaint #201608675,
October 14, 2016

Officer: Napolitano, Thomas
Complainant: Black Female, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Russo, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Napolitano, Thomas
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Napolitano, Thomas Black Female, 39 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Exonerated
Russo, Joseph Black Male, 39 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Napolitano, Thomas Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Summary

On October 14, 2016, at approximately 7:30 a.m., Det. Thomas Napolitano, Sgt. Raymond Tomins, Det. Ravi Narayan, Det. Joseph Russo, and Det. Anthony Giretti, of the Brooklyn Warrant Section, arrived at [redacted] in Manhattan, based on a Parole warrant for [redacted] At the location, Det. Napolitano removed the peephole from the door (Allegation A). After the officers knocked on the door several times, [redacted] opened the door and Det. Napolitano and the officers entered and searched the location (Allegation B and Allegation C). During the search of the residence, the officers found [redacted] inside a bedroom hiding under the bed. [redacted] was handcuffed inside the residence. [redacted] alleged that Det. Russo stated, "Full of shit," and "Fucking around," during the incident (Allegation D).
Upon verifying his identity, the officers determined that [redacted] was not the subject of the Parole warrant, but found that he had an open ICARD for probable cause to arrest in regards to an unrelated incident. [redacted] was transported to the 42nd Precinct stationhouse and was released from the stationhouse the same day. [redacted]s arrest was not processed and he was not issued a summons during this incident; the officers were informed by the 42nd Precinct Detective Squad that the [redacted] was no longer wanted in connection with their case.
This case contains video evidence, a SnagIt copy of which has been placed below. Please note that the original video can be found at Board Review 18 and the transcription can be found at Board Review 05. This video was recorded by [redacted]
NYCHA video footage was also obtained. However, it did not contain any relevant footage of the incident.
This case exceeds 90 days due to initial difficulties with identifying the subject officers' correct command given that the officers were assigned to a different borough than of the incident location. Furthermore, there was also a seven day delay in receiving the NYPD documents from the subject officers' command. Read report for details.


Details

Incident: October 14, 2016
Closed: May 3, 2017

Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 7th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Anthony Giretti, Ravi Narayan, Raymond Tomins
Video evidence collected