Complaint #201809895, November 2018

Incident: November 23, 2018
Received: November 28, 2018
Closed: November 22, 2019


Documents:
Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary (David Ramirez)

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jordan Moses, Dominick Rodriguez, Kimberly Rose
Officer: Barnett, Obrian
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Santos, Rafael
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Santos, Rafael
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Ramirez, David
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramirez, David
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramirez, David
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Santos, Rafael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ramirez, David
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Barnett, Obrian
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Amill, Frank
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Santos, Rafael
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Santos, Rafael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ramirez, David
Complainant: Female, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Barnett, Obrian Female, 23 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Santos, Rafael Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Substantiated (Charges)
Santos, Rafael Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Ramirez, David Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unsubstantiated
Ramirez, David Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unsubstantiated
Ramirez, David Hispanic Male, 25 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Santos, Rafael Hispanic Male, 25 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Ramirez, David Hispanic Male, 25 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Barnett, Obrian Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Amill, Frank Hispanic Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Exonerated
Santos, Rafael Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Substantiated (Charges)
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 25-29 Offensive Language: Gender Officer(s) Unidentified
Santos, Rafael Hispanic Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Exonerated
Ramirez, David Female, 23 Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Ramirez, David
Closed: Retired, June 2023
APU Closed: Retired

Santos, Rafael
Closed: Terminated, August 2020
APU Closed: Terminated


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.