Complaint #201903287, April 2019

Incident: April 16, 2019
Closed: September 30, 2020


Document: APU Quarterly Report summary (Eric Dym)

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Jesus Correa, Cristopher Dominguez, David Martinez, Haronid Pena
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: White Female, 31
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bautista, Natalie
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dym, Eric
Complainant: Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Dym, Eric Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Dym, Eric Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Dym, Eric Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Dym, Eric White Female, 31 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Dym, Eric Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Unsubstantiated
Bautista, Natalie Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Dym, Eric Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Dym, Eric
Closed: Guilty after trial, October 2022
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 18 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.