Complaint #202000106, January 2020

Incident: January 5, 2020
Closed: February 7, 2022


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 42nd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Alexander Velasquez
Officer: Edouard, Fitz
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Edouard, Fitz
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Nunez, Sandy
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nunez, Sandy
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nunez, Sandy
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Edouard, Fitz
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Edouard, Fitz Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Edouard, Fitz Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Nunez, Sandy Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unsubstantiated
Nunez, Sandy Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unsubstantiated
Nunez, Sandy Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Edouard, Fitz Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Nunez, Sandy
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.