Complaint #202201517, February 2022

Incident: February 12, 2022
Received: March 10, 2022
Closed: June 7, 2023


Reason for contact: Report-domestic dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Mock, Roger
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Mock, Roger
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Pala, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Marrero, Matthew
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Pala, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Marrero, Matthew
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Mock, Roger
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Marrero, Matthew
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Marrero, Matthew
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Mock, Roger Black Male, 25-29 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Within NYPD Guidelines
Mock, Roger Black Male, 25-29 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Within NYPD Guidelines
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Restricted Breathing Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Within NYPD Guidelines
Pala, Anthony Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Other Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Marrero, Matthew Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Pala, Anthony Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Marrero, Matthew Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Mock, Roger Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified
Marrero, Matthew Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Restricted Breathing Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unfounded
Marrero, Matthew Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Unfounded

Penalty

Pala, Anthony
Pending
APU - Decision Pending


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.