Complaint #202202269, April 2022

Incident: April 3, 2022
Received: April 11, 2022
Closed: July 20, 2023


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 112th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Cappelmann, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Hughes, Patrick
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Combs, Jonathan
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Cappelmann, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Cappelmann, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Cappelmann, Joseph Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Hughes, Patrick Black Male, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Within NYPD Guidelines
Combs, Jonathan Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Cappelmann, Joseph Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Within NYPD Guidelines
Cappelmann, Joseph Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Penalties

Cappelmann, Joseph
Command Discipline - A

Combs, Jonathan
Command Discipline - A
Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.