Complaint #202206864, December 2021

Incident: December 15, 2021
Received: October 7, 2022
Closed: May 3, 2023


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Ahmemulic, Haris
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Ahmemulic, Haris
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Ahmemulic, Haris
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Denton, Krishawni
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Denton, Krishawni
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Ahmemulic, Haris
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Francis, Christopher
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Ahmemulic, Haris
Complainant: Age 30-34
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Francis, Christopher Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Francis, Christopher Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Ahmemulic, Haris Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Ahmemulic, Haris Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Francis, Christopher Age 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Francis, Christopher Black Female, 55-59 Force: Physical force Unable to Determine
Ahmemulic, Haris Age 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Francis, Christopher Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Denton, Krishawni Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Denton, Krishawni Age 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Ahmemulic, Haris Age 30-34 Discourtesy: Action Unable to Determine
Francis, Christopher Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Francis, Christopher Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Francis, Christopher Age 30-34 Offensive Language: Disability Substantiated (Charges)
Ahmemulic, Haris Age 30-34 Offensive Language: Disability Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Francis, Christopher
Pending
APU - Decision Pending

Ahmemulic, Haris
Pending
APU - Decision Pending

Denton, Krishawni
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.