Dana M. Martillo

Dana M. Martillo

Dana M. Martillo
Badge #2415, White Female
Sergeant at 69th Precinct since December 2023, active
Service started January 2008, made $144,000 last year, Tax #945954

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Gesture
Discourtesy: Other
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Other

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29092
Closed: 11/21/2023
Case: 2021-24117
Closed: 12/7/2021
Case: 2021-23203
Closed: 11/16/2021

View Details

Complaints

9 Complaints
16 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
5 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400255, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202300975, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202107890, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202100840, February 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201907723, August 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201804584, June 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201802071, March 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201602370, March 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201107030, May 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202400255, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female, 60-64 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202300975, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202107890, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202100840, February 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Other Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Gesture Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Offensive Language: Other Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201907723, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 37 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 37 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 37 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201804584, June 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Male, 36 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201802071, March 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201602370, March 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201107030, May 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 17 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29092
Closed: 11/21/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful threat of force.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2021-24117
Closed: 12/7/2021
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous.
  2. Wrongfully made discourteous gesture.
  3. Wrongfully offensive.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2021-23203
Closed: 11/16/2021
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Improper uniform.
  2. Guilty: Conduct prejudicial.
  3. Guilty: Discourtesy.
  4. Guilty: Failed to comply with order.
Penalty: Suspended w/o pay (10 days), vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Diop, Hamath vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV00825, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 1, 2013, ended August 22, 2014
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On November 7, 2011, Plaintiff was in his car when three men entered, robbed Plaintiff, and forced Plaintiff to drive at knifepoint. While driving, Plaintiff’s car was struck by another vehicle, and the three men ordered Plaintiff to continue driving. Plaintiff complied. When Plaintiff saw a police vehicle nearby, he stopped the vehicle, and the three men fled on foot. Plaintiff then attempted to explain to Defendant officers Martillo and Blake that he had been robbed and been forced to drive at knifepoint, but Defendant officers ordered him to be quiet and placed him under arrest without probable cause. The New York Police Department charged Plaintiff with second degree robbery, fourth degree criminal possess...

Other Documents