Gregory Decampi

Badge #16852, White Male
Police Officer at 88th Precinct since September 2022, active
Also served at Manhattan Court Section, 79th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $131,000 last year, Tax #936446

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27651
Closed: 1/9/2023
Case: 2022-26259
Closed: 10/19/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202208599, December 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details

Complaint #202106729, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202104717, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200514101, November 2005
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202208599, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
additional details
Complaint #202106729, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 45-49 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Female, 45-49 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202104717, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200514101, November 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 43 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 44 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27651
Closed: 1/9/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to damage property.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-26259
Closed: 10/19/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare a report.
  2. Use of excessive force.
  3. Wrongfully entered a premise.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (10 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Other Documents

Employment History Summary