Federico J. Martinez

Lieutenant Commander Detective at Drug Enforcement Task Force since August 2024
Service started April 1991, Tax #910860
Hispanic Male, 58

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202307541, August 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Dominican Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #200800019, December 2007
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200508727, July 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200207641, November 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200205748, August 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202307541, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Dominican Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #200800019, December 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Hispanic Female, 28 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200508727, July 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 22 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200207641, November 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Hispanic Male, 46 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200205748, August 2002
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Brown, Shadeesha, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 11CV01068, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 15, 2011, ended May 30, 2013
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers forcibly entered an apartment where Plaintiffs were overnight guests. Plaintiff 1 was handcuffed on the ground and Plaintiff 2 was forced to stand naked at gunpoint for 40 minutes. Finally, Plaintiff 2 was permitted to put on clothes and both Plaintiffs were taken to PSA 7, held for four hours, before being released without being charged for any offense.