Joshua D. Bienvenue

Lieutenant at 75th Precinct since September 2018, active
Service started January 2008, made $186,000 last year, Tax #945511
White Male, 41

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2010-2091
Closed: 2/1/2013

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$100,000   Gignac, Harold vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV07341
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
14 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
4 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206072, June 2020
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201506053, July 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201401252, January 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201013994, October 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Black Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #201004448, April 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200919088, December 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202206072, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Hispanic Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201506053, July 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201401252, January 2014
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201013994, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 15 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 15 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Black Female, 39 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201004448, April 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 41 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Female, 39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200919088, December 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-2091
Closed: 2/1/2013
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off-duty, engaged in a physical and verbal altercation with several individuals known to the Department.
  2. Guilty: While off-duty, failed to remain at the scene of an off-duty physical and verbal altercation with parties known to the Department.
  3. Guilty: While off-duty, having been involved in a police incident, did thereafter fail to promptly report the facts to his Commanding Officer, as required.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)


Lawsuits

Gignac, Harold vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV07341, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 24, 2014, ended September 21, 2015
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was parked in his car when he was approached by defendant officers. The plaintiff was handcuffed, arrested, and sent to the 70th Precinct. The Plaintiff, who is diabetic, informed the defendant officers that he needed to take his insulin he had with him. Approximately three hours later, he received hospitalization. Days later, he was returned to the precinct and charged with Disorderly Conduct.

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional lawsuit 12676/2011