Gerardo M. Urbaez

Gerardo M. Urbaez

Gerardo M. Urbaez
Badge #2356, Hispanic Male, 38
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Specialized Units since September 2021, active
Also served at 48th Precinct, 30th Precinct
Service started July 2008, made $124,000 last year, Tax #947561

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Question

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26236
Closed: 8/9/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$5,000   Id-deen v. City of new york et al., SDNY SDNY 10CV03590
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202003339, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201905214, June 2019
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201500911, February 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: Formalized Training
Penalty: Formalized Training / Command Level Instructions
additional details

Complaint #201401963, February 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201201087, January 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202003339, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Force: Restricted Breathing Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201905214, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 26 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201500911, February 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Hispanic Male, 39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: Formalized Training
Penalty: Formalized Training / Command Level Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201401963, February 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201201087, January 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 26 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26236
Closed: 8/9/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $5,000 total settlements.

Martin, Justin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV00915, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 25, 2014, ended August 1, 2014
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Defendant officer and unidentified officers entered plaintiff's home without permission, breaking the front door lock. Defendant officer approached plaintiff, tightly handcuffed him, arrested him and searched him. Plaintiff was transported to the nearby plaintiff. All charges against the plaintiff were dismissed.

Id-deen v. City of new york et al.
Case # 10CV03590, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$5,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was taking photo of the sunset in the park when the defendant officers came and asked what he was doing. Plaintiff was then accused of being in the park after its business hours and was arrested by the defendant officers. Plaintiff was held in the holding cell with 12 other men with surgical masks. Plaintiff was charged with criminal trespassing in the third degree, parks and recreation offense 1-03(a)(1) for being in the park after posted hours. The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal later.

Nichols v. City of New York et al
Case # 15CV08784, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was in a car crash and responding officers arrested him, took him to Midtown South Precinct, and charged him with Reckless Endangerment, Reckless Driving, and Operating a Motor vehicle while impaired and intoxicated. Charges were later dismissed.

Other Documents