Complaint #201905214, June 2019

Incident: June 15, 2019
Closed: June 17, 2020


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 34th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Steven Moran, Anthony Presto, Jose Tavarez
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Jose
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flores, Christian
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer: Urbaez, Gerardo
Complainant: Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Flores, Christian Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Exonerated
Flores, Christian Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Perez, Jose Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Hispanic Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Hispanic Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Hispanic Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Hispanic Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Perez, Jose Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Flores, Christian Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Urbaez, Gerardo Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded

Penalty

Flores, Christian
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.