Mateusz J. Wybraniec

Mateusz J. Wybraniec

Mateusz J. Wybraniec
Badge #7999, White Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Community Response Team since December 2024
Also served at Brooklyn Court Section, 70th Precinct
Service started July 2018, made $187,000 last year, Tax #966402

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number (2)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25370
Closed: 5/23/2022
Case: 2020-22543
Closed: 10/6/2020

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$12,000   Matthews, Shaka & Nelson, Jermaine vs City of Ny, et al., 2025 EDNY EDNY 25CV02090
View Details

Articles

2020 NYC Protests, CCRB, 1/24/2023

Complaints

6 Complaints
13 Allegations
6 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202410494, October 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202410509, October 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202407107, June 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202107454, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202005916, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Age 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 13, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #202002351, March 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202410494, October 2024
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202410509, October 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202407107, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202107454, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202005916, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Force: Physical force Age 18-20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Age 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 13, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #202002351, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 26 Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25370
Closed: 5/23/2022
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: -
Penalty: Vacation days (3 days)

Case: 2020-22543
Closed: 10/6/2020
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Disorderly conduct.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Refused to obey lawful direction.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Resisting arrest.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), pre-trial suspension days (30 days), vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $12,000 total settlements.

Allen, Roy, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 504365/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, February 10, 2026

Matthews, Shaka & Nelson, Jermaine vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV02090, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 6, 2025, ended April 22, 2026
$12,000 Settlement
Complaint

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 3/11/2024
Employment History Summary