Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $70,000 total settlements.
Satterfield, Felicia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 820067/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 18, 2023
Fraticelli, Jose vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 800478/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 12, 2022, ended October 26, 2022
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 13, 2020, plaintiff was approached by defendant P.O.s Alvino, Vargas, Doe and Roe, who accused him of having committed a crime. Defendant P.O.s proceeded to grab and arrest plaintiff, using excessive force while handcuffing him. Defendant P.O.s further strip-searched plaintiff. Plaintiff was charges with several crimes, of which all were terminated in his favor.
Calo, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 034918/2020E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 22, 2020
Webster, Acquan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 029258/2020,
Supreme Court - Bronx, August 31, 2020, ended July 6, 2023
$25,000 Settlement
